First day of the 9th Annual Student Research and Writing Conference
I
walked into the amphitheater not really knowing what to expect from the 9th
Annual Student Research and Writing Conference. I had rooted my judgement based
on what I had seen in the classroom, where two of my classmates rehearsed their
presentations and discussed the structure behind two popular brainstorming
techniques: the Venn Diagram and Cluster Sampling. Being from the College of
Natural Sciences, these techniques were not new to me; however, I thought it
was interesting that both techniques were being applied not to gather
statistical information or relate variables, but to bring forth traits and
qualities of each of my classmate’s personalities. They were using analytical
diagrams to discover something about themselves, they made them their own, and
by doing so they amplified the versatility and practicality of both diagrams. Consequently,
I could only assume that this conference was a platform to, in some way,
“humanize” all the research techniques college students are exposed to daily by
individualizing each one of them, and giving them a more profound personal
value, as well as characterized them as important tools for self-awareness
and/or self-discovery.
"That is part of the beauty of literature. You discover that your longings are universal longings, that you're not lonely and isolated from anyone. You belong."
- F. Scott Fitzgerald
On
May 8th, I could only attend the conference from 1:00-2:20 pm. There
were three students in the panel, eager to read their pieces. I was happy to
see that the students were not reading research papers, which I had been
dreading, but opted to present instead a variety of literary pieces that ranged
from essays, superhero stories, and journal entries. Although I am no critic, I
found that the superhero short story── based on a childhood memory── and the
short story of a girl who metamorphosed into her boyfriend’s dog were both
tremendously well written and executed. The use of imagery embedded in the
story a feeling of genuine freedom from the writer’s part; I could sense that
these stories were of great value for them, and that those papers they were
holding held a part of their identity, a part they were now willing to expose
to the audience. Despite being strangers, after listening to their stories I
felt I knew those three students slightly better. For example, I learned from
the young man who recreated the energy of a childhood game between two brothers,
and the girl who referred to her mom as her conscious, that both students had
been shaped by their mother’s presence. The mother figure was an important
element in their stories, as she symbolized the order and reason that
accompanies reality. All in all, I feel that this was the purpose of the
conference. The professors that orchestrated the event were not trying to tell
the audience who were their stellar students, but rather that we can find in
literature a creative medium to express ourselves, and that they were willing
to support such freedom because, at the end of the day, the greatest lesson
they can teach us in an English course (taking into account many of us already
know the language) is to take advantage of known techniques and use them as
tools to further prompt our self-discovery.
The
importance of creativity in literature was strengthened with the efficient
discussion on graphic literature that was presented by the second and last
panel I saw that day. I found peculiar that while one would expect English
courses to discuss classic novels, there are some English professors willing to
teach about comics and its role in our changing society. More than ever, comics
are becoming effective mediums of expression because even within their
structural requirements—speech bubbles, patterns, sound effects, etc. – the
writer can express a thought or opinion in a more concise and illustrative
format, which is bound to attract potential readers more effectively than a long
essay discussing the same topic. I wanted to comment on the topic that emerged
during the Q&A segment relating to the limitations comics may impose on
readers and their final comprehension of a topic. I agree with one of the
students in the panel who said that for some people, like himself, may find
illustrations to limit imagination, people who would rather paint their own
version of a story and stick to the images they have created. Nonetheless, I do
not believe comics or illustrations limit readers, but rather present a second
possibility that could even be powerful enough to move or alter the image and
understanding we had before. If anything, our comprehension of the topic
becomes more well-rounded because we have synthesized that “final” opinion by
interconnecting different views and considering other possibilities.
Works Cited
"Graphic Literature: A Blend Of Genre, Medium, And Form". Irosf.Com, 2007, http://www.irosf.com/q/zine/article/10423.
"Imagery | Literary Devices". Literary-Devices.Com, 2010, http://literary-devices.com/content/imagery.
Kumar, Amit. "Personal Development". 2016, http://www.maxvibrant.com/personal-development/personal-development-program-an-integrated-approach.
Web Urbanist. "Recovering Literature: Bold Classic Book Cover Redesigns". 2017, http://weburbanist.com/2013/04/09/recovering-literature-bold-classic-book-cover-redesigns/.

Comments
Post a Comment